Message-ID: <17731.52186.348264.984860@basebud.nulle.part>
Date: 2006-10-28T21:30:02Z
From: Dirk Eddelbuettel
Subject: sources of 2.4.0 patched
In-Reply-To: <17731.47718.276693.860730@stat.math.ethz.ch>
On 28 October 2006 at 22:15, Martin Maechler wrote:
| >>>>> "Dirk" == Dirk Eddelbuettel <edd at debian.org>
| >>>>> on Sat, 28 Oct 2006 08:30:38 -0500 writes:
|
| Dirk> On 28 October 2006 at 00:18, Peter Dalgaard wrote: |
| Dirk> apjaworski at mmm.com writes: | > I get the tarballs form
| Dirk> ftp://ftp.stat.math.ethz.ch/Software/R and I | >
| Dirk> noticed that the only R-patched there is dated
| Dirk> 2006-10-03, while R-devel is | > up to 2006-10-25.
| Dirk> Did, by any chance, a depository for the R-patched | >
| Dirk> tarballs move someplace else, or is the 2006-10-03
| Dirk> version the latest one. | | To my knowledge,
| Dirk> neither. Something has gone wrong. The build date on |
| Dirk> the file is Oct 27... I suspect that the svn update is
| Dirk> somehow failing | on the machine that does the builds
| Dirk> (i.e. it just keeps on building | from the 2006-10-03
| Dirk> checkout).
|
| Dirk> That seems to be the case again this morning.
|
| but no longer now.
Thanks!
| [A "svn cleanup" was needed.
| I've amended the cron-job script to do an "svn cleanup" now
| always before "svn update". This of course is a waste of time in
| 99.9% of cases; but it's just a CPU's time, not a person's ....]
|
| Usually such problems would be solved more quickly if someone
| e-mailed me directly...
Put a README into the directory ?
[ BTW SVN 1.4.0, now in Debian testing testing apparently shrinks archive
size by a third but you need to 'dump' and 'restore'. ]
Dirk
--
Hell, there are no rules here - we're trying to accomplish something.
-- Thomas A. Edison