Skip to content
Prev 32916 / 63421 Next

proposed changes to RSiteSearch

spencerg wrote:
I suppose this depends on your long term plans for the function and 
package.  If you think it should eventually replace the utils function, 
then it makes sense to use the same name:  users won't get used to a new 
name in the meantime.  But if you think it will diverge from that 
function, then you might as well pick a separate name now.

I disagree with Gabor about this being heavy handed, at least while it 
is the only significant export in the package.  If people don't want it, 
don't attach the package.

Duncan Murdoch