attributes of environments
On 7/5/06, Thomas Lumley <tlumley at u.washington.edu> wrote:
On Wed, 5 Jul 2006, Gabor Grothendieck wrote:
On 7/5/06, Thomas Lumley <tlumley at u.washington.edu> wrote:
On Tue, 4 Jul 2006, Gabor Grothendieck wrote:
In the code below, e is an environment which we copy to f and then add attributes to e. Now f winds up with the same attributes. In other words it seems that the attributes are a property of the environment itself and not of the variable. Thus it appears we cannot have two environment variables that correspond to the original environment but with different attributes.
No, we can't. The two variables are references to the same environment, so they are the same. If you want the attributes to be copies rather than references then create a list with the environment as an element and put the attributes on the list.
I realize that that is how it works but what I was really wondering was should it work that way?
I think it really should (and this question has come up before). If you do e<-environment() f<-e then there is only one object that f and e both point to. Now, since such things as S3 class and matrix dimension are implemented as attributes I think you really have to consider the attributes as part of the object [which is also how they are implemented, of course]. So if e and f are the same object they should have the same attributes.
I don't think this follows since in the other cases modifying the object also creates a copy.
Another reasonable position would be to disallow attributes on environments (as we do with NULL, another reference object), but that seems extreme.
I don't think that that would solve it because there is still the issue
of the class attribute which you can't disallow.
In fact consider this:
e <- new.env()
f <- e
class(f) <- c("myenv", "environment")
F <- function(x) UseMethod("F")
F.environment <- function(x) 1
F.myenv <- function(x) 2
F(e) # 2
F(f) # 2
The point is that subclassing does not work properly with environments
yet subclasses of the environment class should be possible since R
is supposed to be OO and I see no valid reason for exclusing environments
for this. I guess in this discussion I am coming to the realization that
this issue really is a problem with the current way R works.