Skip to content
Prev 18802 / 63461 Next

2 x 2 chisq.test (PR#8415)

This is the same as PR#8265, which was reported two months ago by someone 
else from syd.odn.ne.jp.  It still isn't a bug. According to Brian 
Ripley's response at that time, "almost all" the sources he checked gave 
the correction that R uses.

 	-thomas
On Tue, 20 Dec 2005, cig69410 at syd.odn.ne.jp wrote:

            
Thomas Lumley			Assoc. Professor, Biostatistics
tlumley at u.washington.edu	University of Washington, Seattle