Skip to content
Prev 12410 / 63461 Next

type.convert (PR#6781)

On Fri, 16 Apr 2004 hosking@watson.ibm.com wrote:

            
That is documented to be different (a logical vector).
The point is that if no conversion takes place, no checking for na.strings 
took place.  That _was_ intentional, as it is not needed by read.table.
I've added it.
This is wholly intentional, and is now documented.  It is nothing to do 
with whether `na.strings is omitted', though.