Skip to content
Prev 17714 / 63421 Next

looks in liblapack.a not liblapack.so

Which confirms the wisdom of our advice not to use --with-lapack unless 
you have to (a few systems do).  (Quote from the R-admin manual

 	this is definitely *not* recommended

. Perhaps this needs to say `use at your own risk and do not report 
problems with it'!)

There are far too many rogue LAPACK builds out there in distros.

BTW, I don't understand how a Linux distro can supply ATLAS tuned to my 
CPU/FPU.  Dr Goto has had about ten versions of his optimized BLAS 
covering just a small subset of i686 CPUs.  So although a distro's ATLAS 
may be better than a generic BLAS, it seems that it is likely to be 
suboptimal, and perhaps disastrous (I've seen that with mobile Pentium 
chips using ATLAS tuned on desktop machines).  So the recommendation must 
remain to tune ATLAS on your specific hardware.
On Thu, 22 Sep 2005, Peter Dalgaard wrote: