Skip to content
Prev 56092 / 63424 Next

Unexpected argument-matching when some are missing

On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 5:09 AM Emil Bode <emil.bode at dans.knaw.nl> wrote:
Interesting. I would expect it to throw an error, since "x=" is not
syntactically complete. What does "x=" mean anyway? It looks like R
interprets it as "x was not set to anything, i.e., is missing". That
seems reasonable, though I think the example itself is pathological
and would prefer that it produced an error.

--Ista