plot(<lm>): new behavior in R-2.2.0 alpha
Dear Werner,
-----Original Message----- From: Werner Stahel [mailto:stahel at stat.math.ethz.ch] Sent: Friday, September 16, 2005 2:37 AM To: Martin Maechler Cc: R-devel at stat.math.ethz.ch; John Maindonald; Werner Stahel; John Fox Subject: Re: plot(<lm>): new behavior in R-2.2.0 alpha
. . .
For most plots, I like to see a smoother along with the points. I suggest to add the option to include smoothers, not only as an argument to plot.lm, but even as an option().
I agree that smoothers are useful. . . .
I clearly support to add either vif or -- equivalent and more intuitive to me -- R^2_j, the coefficient of determination of lm(X_j~.) However -- this should be included in the coefficient table of print.lm -- this adds another useless and misleading quantity for dummy x-variables It is therefore quite a different question.
Generalized variance inflation factors (as computed by the vif function in car) apply to sets of related regressors in a term, such as dummy regressors. . . . Regards, John