Message-ID: <etPan.5ce8d55a.6d9d6b7e.123@uni.au.dk>
Date: 2019-05-25T05:40:46Z
From: Thomas Mailund
Subject: Give update.formula() an option not to simplify or reorder the result -- request for comments
In-Reply-To: <CAB8pepy_OJyxZNJMm=_GXQrcpYT0dXz22QrCCU0tSo+GRVEL1A@mail.gmail.com>
With a bit of meta programming that manipulates expressions, I don?t think this would be difficult to implement in a package. Well, as difficult as it is to implement a CAS, but not harder. I wrote some code for symbolic differentiation ? I don?t remember where I put it ? and that was easy. But that is because differentiation is just a handful of rules and then the chain rule. I don?t have the skills for handling more complex symbolic manipulation, but anyone who could add it to the language could also easily add it as a package, I think.
Whether in a standard package or not, I have no preference whatsoever.
Cheers
Thomas
On 25 May 2019 at 00.59.44, Abby Spurdle (spurdle.a at gmail.com<mailto:spurdle.a at gmail.com>) wrote:
> Martin Maechler has asked me to send this to R-devel for discussion
> after I submitted it as an enhancement request (
> https://bugs.r-project.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17563).
I think R needs to provide more support for CAS-style symbolic computation.
That is, support by either the R language itself or the standard packages,
or both.
(And certainly not by interfacing with another interpreted language).
Obviously, I don't speak for R Core.
However, this is how I would like to see R move in the future.
...improved symbolic and symbolic-numeric computation...
I think any changes to formula objects or their methods, should be
congruent with these symbolic improvements.
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
______________________________________________
R-devel at r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]