fivenum accuracy (PR#13164)
On 14/10/2008 5:30 PM, dleong at analogic.com wrote:
Full_Name: David Leong Version: 2.7.2 OS: Windows XP Submission from: (NULL) (12.187.86.2) It appears for the fivenum function, there is a strait average between two ranked samples. This should be a linear interpolation between ranks.
Not according to the documentation. This is not a bug. If you want quantiles, use the quantile function. fivenum() is documented to give Tukey's five number summary (minimum, lower-hinge, median, upper-hinge, maximum). Duncan Murdoch
For the following data set #data CaCO3<-c(130.8,129.9,131.5,131.2,129.5,132.7,131.5,127.8,133.7,132.2,134.8,131.7,133.9,129.8,131.4,128.8,132.7,132.8,131.4,131.3) fivenum reports 127.80 130.35 131.45 132.70 134.80 130.35 should be 130.125. The other are correct. For the 20 points, the rank is (20+1)/4=5.25 so the weighting factor is 0.25 not 0.5.
______________________________________________ R-devel at r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel