Message-ID: <23687.54725.494402.883738@hornik.net>
Date: 2019-03-12T15:52:37Z
From: Kurt Hornik
Subject: Spurious warning from checkReplaceFuns about a non-replacement function
In-Reply-To: <CAJmOi+PXJcXrf+e=mWeiPj=TTaxjB7trUTyUBOF0FqfCfY0_xw@mail.gmail.com>
>>>>> Hugh Parsonage writes:
> If a function contains the pattern `<-` it is (with a few exceptions)
> deemed to be a replacement function and in particular must have second
> argument `value` to pass R CMD check.
> Consider the function %<->% or any other function containing <- within
> grapes. I claim that such functions should not be considered
> replacement functions and thus the R CMD check should not require its
> second argument to be `value`.
I just committed c76224 which drops %xxx% binops from the list of
(probable) replacement functions.
Thanks for spotting this!
Best
-k
> Recommend in the function tools::checkReplaceFuns
> grep("<-", objects_in_code,
> value = TRUE)
> be changed to
> grep("<-$", objects_in_code,
> value = TRUE)
> Hugh.
> ______________________________________________
> R-devel at r-project.org mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel