RFC: no automatic updates of packages with major version change
On Mon, 28 Oct 2002 Friedrich.Leisch@ci.tuwien.ac.at wrote:
We want to define a "major version number change" as a change of the first digit of the version number, such that 1.1.1 -> 2.0.0 is a major change, while 1.1.1 -> 1.2.0 is not. An exception will be that a move from 0.x to 1.x is no major change (because the 0.x series is read as "working towards 1.0").
While R could set whatever standards it likes for package numbers I think it's asking for trouble to require no API changes before version 1.0 (as grid illustrates) -thomas -.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.- r-devel mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe" (in the "body", not the subject !) To: r-devel-request@stat.math.ethz.ch _._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._