Skip to content
Prev 14349 / 63424 Next

Loading libraries in 2.0.0 (PR#7364)

Where do you think the bug is here?  Both the NEWS file (in the very first 
section) and the rw-FAQ tell you explicitly that packages (sic) have to be 
reinstalled for 2.0.0.  So does the error message you quote.  What do you 
think

     o   Packages must have been re-installed for this version, and
         library() will enforce this.

means?  Why do you think the major number has been changed from 1 to 2?

Since you are clearly not sure, the FAQ specifically asks you NOT to file 
a bug report but to ask someone who knows.

There are updated Windows builds for Lindsey's `libraries' on his site.
On Fri, 12 Nov 2004 paul.louisell@pw.utc.com wrote:

            
Yes, the package is there but it is not valid -- as the error message 
says.  Whatever DO you think the message means?