classed
On Fri, Sep 15, 2000 at 02:21:29PM +1000, Bill Venables wrote:
And nor does it. What happens is that a new object is constructed from x, with (in this case) extra bits and pieces tacked on and (here) that new object is assigned the name y. Writing a function to modify its argument is possible (e.g. fix() does it) but not altogether straightforward, especially if you want it to work in the most general case.
Hmmm, OK now that I test it out you are quite correct. But that implies that the whole object is copied because later modification of either the original or the result do not propagate between x and y... unless R has some sort of copy-on-write flag which I never noticed when wandering through the R source (a lot probably falls into that category). If it doesn't use copy-on-write then the result will be additional slowdown when all your data is copied again and again (I guess it depends on how big the object is). - Tel -.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.- r-devel mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe" (in the "body", not the subject !) To: r-devel-request@stat.math.ethz.ch _._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._