Here is another minor typo which I had spotted three days ago and sent to
Brian, but have not heard back nor seen it incorporated. Doubly trivial as in
a comment but a dual typo nevertheless. Would be nice if someone could fold
this in. I still have the same diff here for the current r87707.
edd at rob:~/svn/r-devel$ svn diff doc/manual/R-exts.texi
Index: doc/manual/R-exts.texi
===================================================================
--- doc/manual/R-exts.texi (revision 87685)
+++ doc/manual/R-exts.texi (working copy)
@@ -5904,7 +5904,7 @@
@c RHEL 7 came with GCC 4.8, with 4.4 available.
@c RHEL 8 has GCC 8 with 9 available
@c RHEL 9 has GCC 11
- at c All versions of Cwntos is now EOL.
+ at c All versions of Centos are now EOL.
A common error is to assume recent versions of compilers or OSes. In
production environments `long term support' versions of OSes may be in
use for many years, at footnote{Ubuntu provides 5 years of support (but
edd at rob:~/svn/r-devel$
--
dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | edd at debian.org