Skip to content
Prev 891 / 63424 Next

unary !


        
TL> On Sun, 4 Jan 1998, Kurt Hornik wrote:
TL> I complained about this more than a year ago and I thought we (or
TL> in those days R+R) had decided it was a feature -- I just explained
TL> to someone on r-help that it was one of the deliberate
TL> incompatibilities that ! didn't work on numerics.
O.k.  I will add this to the FAQ but I am still not convinced.  If I may
e.g. do

R> 0 & 0
[1] FALSE
R> 1 | 0
[1] TRUE

then why can't !0 be TRUE?

-k
-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-
r-devel mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html
Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe"
(in the "body", not the subject !)  To: r-devel-request@stat.math.ethz.ch
_._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._