Skip to content
Prev 54634 / 63424 Next

Why R should never move to git

Lately I've been doing some work with the manipulateWidget package, 
which lives on Github at 
https://github.com/rte-antares-rpackage/manipulateWidget/.  Last week I 
found a bug, so being a good community member, I put together a patch.

Since the package lives on Github, I followed instructions to put 
together a "pull request":

- I forked the main branch to my own Github account as 
<https://github.com/dmurdoch/manipulateWidget>.

- I checked out my fork into RStudio.

- I fixed the bug, and submitted the pull request 
<https://github.com/rte-antares-rpackage/manipulateWidget/pull/47>.

Then I felt good about myself, and continued on with my work.  Today I 
tracked down another bug, unrelated to the previous one.  I know enough 
about git to know that I shouldn't commit this fix to my fork, because 
it would then become part of the previous pull request.

So I created a branch within my fork, and committed the change there. 
But Github provides no way to create a pull request that only includes 
the new stuff!  Every attempt I made would have included everything from 
both bug fixes.

I've read online about creating a new branch based on the master copy, 
and "cherry picking" just the final change:  but all the instructions 
I've tried so far have failed.

Okay, I know the solution:  I need to burn the whole thing down (to 
quote Jenny Bryan).  I'll just create a new fork, and put the new bug 
fix in a branch there.

I can't!  I don't know if this is a Git restriction or a Github 
restriction, but it won't let me create a new fork without deleting the 
old one.  I don't know if deleting the previous fork would also delete 
the previous PR, so I'm not going to do this.

This is ridiculous!  It is such an easy concept:  I want to take the 
diff between my most recent commit and the one before, and send that 
diff to the owners of the master copy.  This should be a trivial (and it 
is in svn).

Git and Github allow the most baroque arrangements, but can't do this 
simple task.  That's an example of really bad UI design.

Duncan Murdoch

Thread (26 messages)

Duncan Murdoch Why R should never move to git Jan 24 Gábor Csárdi Why R should never move to git Jan 24 Hugh Parsonage Why R should never move to git Jan 24 Duncan Murdoch Why R should never move to git Jan 24 Gábor Csárdi Why R should never move to git Jan 24 Duncan Murdoch Why R should never move to git Jan 24 Gábor Csárdi Why R should never move to git Jan 24 Duncan Murdoch Why R should never move to git Jan 24 Gábor Csárdi Why R should never move to git Jan 24 Iñaki Ucar Why R should never move to git Jan 24 Duncan Murdoch Why R should never move to git Jan 25 Dirk Eddelbuettel Why R should never move to git Jan 25 Iñaki Ucar Why R should never move to git Jan 25 Duncan Murdoch Why R should never move to git Jan 25 Duncan Murdoch Why R should never move to git Jan 25 Gábor Csárdi Why R should never move to git Jan 25 Joris Meys Why R should never move to git Jan 25 Mario Emmenlauer Why R should never move to git Jan 25 Jari Oksanen Why R should never move to git Jan 25 Martin Morgan Why R should never move to git Jan 25 Duncan Murdoch Why R should never move to git Jan 25 Duncan Murdoch Why R should never move to git Jan 25 Iñaki Ucar Why R should never move to git Jan 25 Juan Telleria Ruiz de Aguirre Why R should never move to git Jan 25 Juan Telleria Ruiz de Aguirre Why R should never move to git Jan 25 Juan Telleria Ruiz de Aguirre Why R should never move to git Jan 26