Skip to content
Prev 3293 / 63424 Next

new chron problems in RW0990

Kurt Hornik wrote
However, the older version of chron DID allow creating CORRECT chron objects
with mm/dd/yyyy
[1] 10956
[1] 10957

wheras backformatting in the print method failed
[1] 12/31/99
[1] 01/01/100

thus I tend to see it as a bug, because it may break old code.

Still, I don't know whether it is approbriate to send a bug report to
r-bugs@lists.r-project.org ?


Regards

-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-
r-devel mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html
Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe"
(in the "body", not the subject !)  To: r-devel-request@stat.math.ethz.ch
_._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._