Skip to content
Prev 37478 / 63424 Next

No RTFM?

Paul Johnson <pauljohn32 <at> gmail.com> writes:
[snip: lots more snippage to try get gmane to let me post]
I really like this.
  Some suggestions:

=========================
I would make this optional or put it further down. I don't see that
many problems on the list that are due to non-standard installations.
Most of the most clueless people are (a) using stock installations
and/or (b) don't even know who installed R on the computer they are
using. I don't mind sending them to find out/ask if it's a real
issue, but it feels like an unnecessary hurdle.
This is where we have to emphasize 'small, reproducible example'
more strongly -- perhaps move the next item up. 
I dread the pages and pages of random R-session crap
that will be posted following this advice literally ...
[note that there is already information on 'what is a bug' in the
posting guide -- I think -- or maybe it's the R FAQ]
This should be for more general statistics questions, and perhaps
put second.
perhaps add
  install.packages("sos"); library(sos); findFn("whatever")
^^^ maintainer; use maintainer("whatever") to find their e-mail address.
Is there any point posting this on the Wiki and letting people
hack at it?

  Ben