Skip to content

ADA Compliance

5 messages · Hunter, Zayne, Ben Bolker, Peter Dalgaard +2 more

#
Hello,


I am working with Ball State University to obtain a license of R. As part of our requirements for obtaining new software, we must review the VPAT for ADA compliance. Can you provide this information for me?

Thanks,


Zayne Hunter
Technology Advisor & Vendor Relations Manager
Ball State University
zayne.hunter at bsu.edu
(765)285-7853
#
I would be very surprised if anyone had written up a VPAT 
<https://www.section508.gov/sell/vpat/> for R.

   It won't help you with the bureaucratic requirements, but R is in 
fact very accessible to visually impaired users: e.g. see

 
https://community.rstudio.com/t/accessibility-of-r-rstudio-compared-to-excel-for-student-that-is-legally-blind/103849/3

 From https://github.com/ajrgodfrey/BrailleR

 > R is perhaps the most blind-friendly statistical software option 
because all scripts can be written in plain text, using the text editor 
a user prefers, and all output can be saved in a wide range of file 
formats. The advent of R markdown and other reproducible research 
techniques can offer the blind user a degree of efficiency that is not 
offered in many other statistical software options. In addition, the 
processed Rmd files are usually HTML which are the best supported files 
in terms of screen reader development.

   (And there is continued attention to making sure R stays accessible 
in this way: 
https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-devel/2022-December/082180.html; 
https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-devel/2023-February/082313.html)

   R is also easy to use without a mouse, which should improve 
accessibility for users with neuromuscular conditions.

    cheers
     Ben Bolker
On 2024-01-12 2:50 p.m., Hunter, Zayne via R-devel wrote:
2 days later
#
Yes,

Jonathon Godfrey, who wrote the r-devel/2022-December mail (and is himself blind), would be my standard go-to guy in matters relating to visual impairment, screen readers and all that.

Peter D.

  
    
#
Slightly tangential, but about two decades ago I was researching
how multimedia databases might be reasonably structured. To have a
concrete test case, I built a database of English Country (Playford)
dances, which I called Playford's Progeny. (Ben B. will be aware of
this, too.) This proved rather popular, but around 2010 the busybody
brigade at uOttawa sent me a demand to prove that the website satisfied
(name your jurisdiction, I think mine was Ontario provincial something)
accessibility requirements.

I figured my time to do this was worth $2-3K and simply went out and
bought service for about $100. It's now hosted on ottawaenglishdance.org.
Interestingly the main contributor to my site at the time was blind.
Go figure.

The point I'm getting at is that it may make people feel good to
legislate about accessibility, but my guess is the old adage of
catching more flies with honey than vinegar is illustrated here to a
horrifying degree. I'm afraid I've no practical advice on how to
satisfy the "rules".

Best of luck getting things available for as many folk as possible,
no matter their particular disabilities. It's something I support,
just not a lot of rules.

JN
On 2024-01-15 07:10, peter dalgaard wrote:
1 day later
#
On 1/12/2024 1:50 PM, Hunter, Zayne via R-devel wrote:
R is open source so there really should be no need to "obtain a license 
for R".? This can hopefully reduce the hoops you must jump through.?? 
Mostly, I believe you can think of the R license as GPL2/GPL3, but you 
can read more about other R and R package licenses here: 
https://www.r-project.org/Licenses/#:~:text=R%20as%20a%20package%20is,%2C%20which%20includes%20GPL%2D3%20.