Skip to content

summary.default & is.recursive (PR#221)

1 message · Peter Dalgaard

#
Paul Gilbert <pgilbert@bank-banque-canada.ca> writes:
Yup, it's a bug. Cc'ed to r-bugs so that we don't forget.
[1] FALSE
[1] TRUE

[maybe Martin would want to add a check that is.whatever works
identically on lists and pairlists. Not is.pairlist, though...]