I followed the suggestions at http://developer.r-project.org/SVNtips.html to check out an anonymous copy of the development branch of R, but so far I have been unable to figure out an analogous way to track the development branch of the recommended packages. (I'm assuming they actually live somewhere on the same SVN server, which might not be true ...) Any ideas (including pointing out the obvious, or the obvious-in-hindsight)? thanks Ben Bolker -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 261 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-devel/attachments/20091215/b3bf5f72/attachment.bin>
silly SVN question
7 messages · Ben Bolker, Kasper Daniel Hansen, Brian Ripley +2 more
The obvious: the recommended packages are inside src/library Kasper
On Dec 15, 2009, at 10:57 AM, Ben Bolker wrote:
I followed the suggestions at http://developer.r-project.org/SVNtips.html to check out an anonymous copy of the development branch of R, but so far I have been unable to figure out an analogous way to track the development branch of the recommended packages. (I'm assuming they actually live somewhere on the same SVN server, which might not be true ...) Any ideas (including pointing out the obvious, or the obvious-in-hindsight)? thanks Ben Bolker
______________________________________________ R-devel at r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
Yes, but ... on my system at least the Recommended folder has a recent version of the Makefile, but the packages are old tarballs. I have a fuzzy memory that I needed to download the packages from somewhere else to build a complete/up-to-date version, but I have forgotten where I read that. And https://svn.r-project.org/R/trunk/src/library/Recommended/ shows that only Makefile.in and Makefile.win live here. Does your src/library/Recommended have up-to-date source code for all the packages ... ? cheers Ben
Kasper Daniel Hansen wrote:
The obvious: the recommended packages are inside src/library Kasper On Dec 15, 2009, at 10:57 AM, Ben Bolker wrote:
I followed the suggestions at http://developer.r-project.org/SVNtips.html to check out an anonymous copy of the development branch of R, but so far I have been unable to figure out an analogous way to track the development branch of the recommended packages. (I'm assuming they actually live somewhere on the same SVN server, which might not be true ...) Any ideas (including pointing out the obvious, or the obvious-in-hindsight)? thanks Ben Bolker
______________________________________________ R-devel at r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
Ben Bolker Associate professor, Biology Dep't, Univ. of Florida bolker at ufl.edu / people.biology.ufl.edu/bolker GPG key: people.biology.ufl.edu/bolker/benbolker-publickey.asc -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 261 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-devel/attachments/20091215/087b06eb/attachment.bin>
On Tue, 15 Dec 2009, Ben Bolker wrote:
I followed the suggestions at http://developer.r-project.org/SVNtips.html to check out an anonymous copy of the development branch of R, but so far I have been unable to figure out an analogous way to track the development branch of the recommended packages. (I'm assuming they actually live somewhere on the same SVN server, which might not be true ...) Any ideas (including pointing out the obvious, or the obvious-in-hindsight)?
https://svn.r-project.org/R-packages/trunk but - not all of the recommended packages are there. - Matrix and survival have migrated to R-forge - in some cases what is on the svn archive has lagged the release version. It is most useful for the packages maintained by R-core collectively.
Brian D. Ripley, ripley at stats.ox.ac.uk Professor of Applied Statistics, http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/~ripley/ University of Oxford, Tel: +44 1865 272861 (self) 1 South Parks Road, +44 1865 272866 (PA) Oxford OX1 3TG, UK Fax: +44 1865 272595
thanks!
Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
On Tue, 15 Dec 2009, Ben Bolker wrote:
I followed the suggestions at http://developer.r-project.org/SVNtips.html to check out an anonymous copy of the development branch of R, but so far I have been unable to figure out an analogous way to track the development branch of the recommended packages. (I'm assuming they actually live somewhere on the same SVN server, which might not be true ...) Any ideas (including pointing out the obvious, or the obvious-in-hindsight)?
https://svn.r-project.org/R-packages/trunk but - not all of the recommended packages are there. - Matrix and survival have migrated to R-forge - in some cases what is on the svn archive has lagged the release version. It is most useful for the packages maintained by R-core collectively.
Ben Bolker Associate professor, Biology Dep't, Univ. of Florida bolker at ufl.edu / people.biology.ufl.edu/bolker GPG key: people.biology.ufl.edu/bolker/benbolker-publickey.asc -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 261 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-devel/attachments/20091215/75e0957e/attachment.bin>
Maybe you are looking for ./tools/rsync-recommended I think only the base set of packages (lower priority than recommended) are in src/library. > packageDescription( "utils" )[["Priority"]] [1] "base" > packageDescription( "Matrix" )[["Priority"]] [1] "recommended" Romain
On 12/15/2009 05:14 PM, Ben Bolker wrote:
Yes, but ... on my system at least the Recommended folder has a recent version of the Makefile, but the packages are old tarballs. I have a fuzzy memory that I needed to download the packages from somewhere else to build a complete/up-to-date version, but I have forgotten where I read that. And https://svn.r-project.org/R/trunk/src/library/Recommended/ shows that only Makefile.in and Makefile.win live here. Does your src/library/Recommended have up-to-date source code for all the packages ... ? cheers Ben Kasper Daniel Hansen wrote:
The obvious: the recommended packages are inside src/library Kasper On Dec 15, 2009, at 10:57 AM, Ben Bolker wrote:
I followed the suggestions at http://developer.r-project.org/SVNtips.html to check out an anonymous copy of the development branch of R, but so far I have been unable to figure out an analogous way to track the development branch of the recommended packages. (I'm assuming they actually live somewhere on the same SVN server, which might not be true ...) Any ideas (including pointing out the obvious, or the obvious-in-hindsight)? thanks Ben Bolker
Romain Francois Professional R Enthusiast +33(0) 6 28 91 30 30 http://romainfrancois.blog.free.fr |- http://tr.im/HlX9 : new package : bibtex |- http://tr.im/Gq7i : ohloh `- http://tr.im/FtUu : new package : highlight
2 days later
Are you searching for ./tools/rsync-recommended? -roger
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 11:14 AM, Ben Bolker <bolker at ufl.edu> wrote:
?Yes, but ... on my system at least the Recommended folder has a recent version of the Makefile, but the packages are old tarballs. ?I have a fuzzy memory that I needed to download the packages from somewhere else to build a complete/up-to-date version, but I have forgotten where I read that. ?And https://svn.r-project.org/R/trunk/src/library/Recommended/ shows that only Makefile.in and Makefile.win live here. ?Does your ?src/library/Recommended have up-to-date source code for all the packages ... ? ?cheers ? Ben Kasper Daniel Hansen wrote:
The obvious: the recommended packages are inside ? src/library Kasper On Dec 15, 2009, at 10:57 AM, Ben Bolker wrote:
?I followed the suggestions at http://developer.r-project.org/SVNtips.html to check out an anonymous copy of the development branch of R, but so far I have been unable to figure out an analogous way to track the development branch of the recommended packages. (I'm assuming they actually live somewhere on the same SVN server, which might not be true ...) Any ideas (including pointing out the obvious, or the obvious-in-hindsight)? ?thanks ? ?Ben Bolker
______________________________________________ R-devel at r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
-- Ben Bolker Associate professor, Biology Dep't, Univ. of Florida bolker at ufl.edu / people.biology.ufl.edu/bolker GPG key: people.biology.ufl.edu/bolker/benbolker-publickey.asc
______________________________________________ R-devel at r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
Roger D. Peng | http://www.biostat.jhsph.edu/~rpeng/