It is equivalent to 'evalq' except the its default
^^^
R.version.string
[1] "R version 2.1.1, 2005-06-20" ---------------------------------------------------------- SIGSIG -- signature too long (core dumped)
documentation for eval() typo
4 messages · Paul Roebuck, Brian Ripley
Thank you. It would be easier to deal with thes reports if in future you could provide a patch against the source file (here eval.Rd).
On Sun, 14 Aug 2005, Paul Roebuck wrote:
It is equivalent to 'evalq' except the its default
Brian D. Ripley, ripley at stats.ox.ac.uk Professor of Applied Statistics, http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/~ripley/ University of Oxford, Tel: +44 1865 272861 (self) 1 South Parks Road, +44 1865 272866 (PA) Oxford OX1 3TG, UK Fax: +44 1865 272595
On Sun, 14 Aug 2005, Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
On Sun, 14 Aug 2005, Paul Roebuck wrote:
It is equivalent to 'evalq' except the its default
It would be easier to deal with thes reports if in future you could provide a patch against the source file (here eval.Rd).
I normally download a copy of the current binary and the
matching source distribution for performing searches, so
would not be tracking r-devel or r-patched updates.
Would the following have been palatable as annotated?
R-2.1.1/src/library/base/man/eval.Rd:
59c59
< equivalent to \code{evalq} except that its default argument creates a
---
equivalent to \code{evalq} except the its default argument creates a
---------------------------------------------------------- SIGSIG -- signature too long (core dumped)
On Mon, 15 Aug 2005, Paul Roebuck wrote:
On Sun, 14 Aug 2005, Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
On Sun, 14 Aug 2005, Paul Roebuck wrote:
It is equivalent to 'evalq' except the its default
It would be easier to deal with thes reports if in future you could provide a patch against the source file (here eval.Rd).
I normally download a copy of the current binary and the matching source distribution for performing searches, so would not be tracking r-devel or r-patched updates. Would the following have been palatable as annotated?
Yes, it would have been easy to incorporate.
R-2.1.1/src/library/base/man/eval.Rd:
59c59
< equivalent to \code{evalq} except that its default argument creates a
---
equivalent to \code{evalq} except the its default argument creates a
Brian D. Ripley, ripley at stats.ox.ac.uk Professor of Applied Statistics, http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/~ripley/ University of Oxford, Tel: +44 1865 272861 (self) 1 South Parks Road, +44 1865 272866 (PA) Oxford OX1 3TG, UK Fax: +44 1865 272595