I get this (with R-2.12 and R-2.13, didn't try with earlier versions):
> max(c(NaN, NA))
[1] NA
> max(c(NA, NaN))
[1] NaN
I get the same thing with min().
The fact that the result of 'max(x)' or 'min(x)' depends on the order
of the elements in 'x' is surprising. It also seems to contradict the
man page:
By definition the min/max of a numeric vector containing an ?NaN?
is ?NaN?, except that the min/max of any vector containing an ?NA?
is ?NA? even if it also contains an ?NaN?.
Cheers,
H.
Herv? Pag?s Program in Computational Biology Division of Public Health Sciences Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center 1100 Fairview Ave. N, M2-B876 P.O. Box 19024 Seattle, WA 98109-1024 E-mail: hpages at fhcrc.org Phone: (206) 667-5791 Fax: (206) 667-1319