Skip to content

trojan at current development version?

4 messages · Andreas Mayr, Peter Dalgaard, Uwe Ligges +1 more

#
On Jan 28, 2011, at 09:47 , Andreas Mayr wrote:

            
We have seen false positives before (accidental mismatch between virus signatures and legitimate programs). But presumably, the Windows maintainers will double-check, just in case.
#
On 28.01.2011 13:49, peter dalgaard wrote:
Oh yes, we got such reports before. People reported to Avira and it went 
away. Now it is there again. Hopeless, I assume.

Duncan: Perhaps we can add at the download page that Avira reports 
open.exe to be infected from time to time.

Best wishes,
Uwe
#
Uwe Ligges <ligges <at> statistik.tu-dortmund.de> writes:
signatures and legitimate
case.
Another note for the paranoid is that the MD5 sum for the binary
is posted, so you can at least check consistency.  On the  other hand,
if someone managed to compromise an entire CRAN mirror, they could
also post MD5 sums for their nastified version ...  you could always
go check the MD5 sums on another CRAN mirror (or on the main page),
which would make the attacker work much harder ...