Skip to content

Surprising length() of POSIXlt vector (PR#14073)

4 messages · Mark White, Benilton Carvalho, Peter Dalgaard +1 more

Original
Mark White
# 
Arrays of POSIXlt dates always return a length of 9.  This
is correct (they're really lists of vectors of seconds,
hours, and so forth), but other methods disguise them as
flat vectors, giving superficially surprising behaviour:

  strings <- paste('2009-1-', 1:31, sep='')
  dates <- strptime(strings, format="%Y-%m-%d")

  print(dates)
  #  [1] "2009-01-01" "2009-01-02" "2009-01-03" "2009-01-04" "2009-01-05"
  #  [6] "2009-01-06" "2009-01-07" "2009-01-08" "2009-01-09" "2009-01-10"
  # [11] "2009-01-11" "2009-01-12" "2009-01-13" "2009-01-14" "2009-01-15"
  # [16] "2009-01-16" "2009-01-17" "2009-01-18" "2009-01-19" "2009-01-20"
  # [21] "2009-01-21" "2009-01-22" "2009-01-23" "2009-01-24" "2009-01-25"
  # [26] "2009-01-26" "2009-01-27" "2009-01-28" "2009-01-29" "2009-01-30"
  # [31] "2009-01-31"

  print(length(dates))
  # [1] 9
  
  str(dates)
  # POSIXlt[1:9], format: "2009-01-01" "2009-01-02" "2009-01-03" "2009-01-04" ...

  print(dates[20])
  # [1] "2009-01-20"

  print(length(dates[20]))
  # [1] 9

I've since realised that POSIXct makes date vectors easier,
but could we also have something like:

  length.POSIXlt <- function(x) { length(x$sec) }

in datetime.R, to avoid breaking functions (like the
str.POSIXt method) which use length() in this way?

Thanks,
Mark <><

------

Version:
 platform = i686-pc-linux-gnu
 arch = i686
 os = linux-gnu
 system = i686, linux-gnu
 status = 
 major = 2
 minor = 10.0
 year = 2009
 month = 10
 day = 26
 svn rev = 50208
 language = R
 version.string = R version 2.10.0 (2009-10-26)

Locale:
C

Search Path:
 .GlobalEnv, package:stats, package:graphics, package:grDevices, package:utils, package:datasets, package:methods, Autoloads, package:base
Benilton Carvalho
# 
Check the documentation and the archives. Not a bug. b
On Nov 19, 2009, at 8:30 PM, mark at celos.net wrote:

            

      
      
      
    

        

      
      
    

  
  


  


      

    

    

      
      

        


  

        

      Peter Dalgaard
    

    

      
      #
    

  


  

      
mark at celos.net wrote:

            

      
      
      
    

        
[You need "wishlist" in the title for this sort of stuff.]

I'd be wary of this. Just the other day we found that identical() broke 
on some objects because a package had length() redefined as a class 
method. I.e. the danger is that something wants to use length() with its 
original low-level interpretation.

            

      
      
      
    

        

      
      
    

        

  
    

      
      
    

  


  


      

    

    

      
      

        


  

        

      Romain Francois
    

    

      
      #
    

  


  

      
On 11/20/2009 09:54 AM, Peter Dalgaard wrote:

            

      
      
      
    

        
str is another example