Skip to content

gamma and lgamma functions (PR#684)

2 messages · james.lindsey@luc.ac.be, Kurt Hornik

#
The following seems very strange:
[1] 3.243307
[1] -25.61830
  Jim

-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-
r-devel mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html
Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe"
(in the "body", not the subject !)  To: r-devel-request@stat.math.ethz.ch
_._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._
#
I don't think so:

     The functions `gamma' and `lgamma' return the gamma function
     Gamma(x) and the natural logarithm of the absolute value of the
     gamma function.

Notice the ABSOULUTE VALUE.

R> log(abs(gamma(-0.04)))
[1] 3.243307

-k
-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-
r-devel mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html
Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe"
(in the "body", not the subject !)  To: r-devel-request@stat.math.ethz.ch
_._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._