ripley writes:
On Fri, 9 Apr 1999 ihaka@stat.auckland.ac.nz wrote:
On Fri, 9 Apr 1999, Prof Brian D Ripley wrote:
ppois(q, lambda) where q is undefined! It should only be defined for integers. Similarly, x should only be integers.
Ummmm. I guess I see the argument for dpois, but I thought the distribution function was defined for all values. Wouldn't it be in order to apply the integer argument function to floor(q) perhaps?
Try reading on:
It seems better to make ppois defined as the CDF for all q. The code
had
x = floor(x + 0.5); and that should be something like floor(x + 1e-7).
(q in R is x in C.)
This seems to be what S does.
ppois(1.5, 2)
[1] 0.4060058
ppois(1.1, 2)
[1] 0.4060058
and R-0.64.1 does
ppois(1.5, 2)
[1] 0.4060058
ppois(1.1, 2)
[1] 0.4060058
dpois(1.1, 2)
Warning: non-integer x = 1.100000 [1] 0
Happy?
No! Why the warning? dpois(non-integer, something) makes perfect sense, and simply gives 0. (Yes, dwilcox() and dsignrank() will need fixing, too ...) -k -.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.- r-devel mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe" (in the "body", not the subject !) To: r-devel-request@stat.math.ethz.ch _._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._