Skip to content

PR#751

2 messages · apjaworski@mmm.com, Peter Dalgaard

#
... snip ...
Mm, no. The coefficients are by increasing degree, so these are the
roots of 2+x+x^2

... snip ...

The manual page seems to have a typo.  It says (1.2.0 on Win)

Arguments:

       z: the vector of polynomial coefficients in decreasing order.


Andy

-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-
r-devel mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html
Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe"
(in the "body", not the subject !)  To: r-devel-request@stat.math.ethz.ch
_._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._
#
apjaworski@mmm.com writes:
I suppose that could be clearer (it kind of depends on what you
consider the "normal" order), but it also has

              p(x) = z1 + z2 * x + ... + z[n] * x^(n-1)

which should be clear enough.