Sorry, my previous message said using lty="2" made line disappear. Wrong. What happens is that "2" is dots "3" is dashes BUT docs say "2" is dashes "3" is dots So there is an error in the docs. Bill -.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.- r-devel mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe" (in the "body", not the subject !) To: r-devel-request@stat.math.ethz.ch _._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._
lty
5 messages · Bill Simpson, Peter Dalgaard
Bill Simpson <wsimpson@uwinnipeg.ca> writes:
Sorry, my previous message said using lty="2" made line disappear. Wrong. What happens is that "2" is dots "3" is dashes BUT docs say "2" is dashes "3" is dots So there is an error in the docs.
Nope: lty=1 solid lty=2 dashed lty=3 dotted lty=4 dotdashed lty="1" pattern: 1 "dot" on, 1 "dot" off lty="2" pattern: 2 "dots" on, 2 "dots" off lty="3" pattern: 3 "dots" on, 3 "dots" off lty="32" pattern: 3 "dots" on, 2 "dots" off lty="124" pattern: 1 on, 2 off, 4 on, 1 off, 2 on, 4 off, ...and so forth... You can see this clearly if you start with par(lwd=5). As far as I can see without actually digging into the source, 2 == "4" 3 == "13" 4 == "3134" So the docs are OK, but perhaps we need to distinguish more clearly between integer and character lty's. The dot-dash pattern on X11 looks wrong, though. I think it should have been "1343", i.e. same pattern, reverse colors.
O__ ---- Peter Dalgaard Blegdamsvej 3 c/ /'_ --- Dept. of Biostatistics 2200 Cph. N (*) \(*) -- University of Copenhagen Denmark Ph: (+45) 35327918 ~~~~~~~~~~ - (p.dalgaard@biostat.ku.dk) FAX: (+45) 35327907 -.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.- r-devel mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe" (in the "body", not the subject !) To: r-devel-request@stat.math.ethz.ch _._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._
Sorry, my previous message said using lty="2" made line disappear. Wrong. What happens is that "2" is dots "3" is dashes BUT docs say "2" is dashes "3" is dots So there is an error in the docs.
Nope: lty=1 solid lty=2 dashed lty=3 dotted lty=4 dotdashed lty="1" pattern: 1 "dot" on, 1 "dot" off lty="2" pattern: 2 "dots" on, 2 "dots" off lty="3" pattern: 3 "dots" on, 3 "dots" off lty="32" pattern: 3 "dots" on, 2 "dots" off lty="124" pattern: 1 on, 2 off, 4 on, 1 off, 2 on, 4 off, ...and so forth...
Peter, to me (and this is English language) "dot" is shorter than "dash"! .-.-- dot dash dot dash dash. So "dot" SHOULD be label for lty="2" pattern: 2 "dots" on, 2 "dots" off And "dash" SHOULD be label for lty="3" pattern: 3 "dots" on, 3 "dots" off. Since dot is shorter than dash.
You can see this clearly if you start with par(lwd=5). As far as I can see without actually digging into the source,
This is answer to previous posting on lwd. So it is there, just not documented. Thanks.
The dot-dash pattern on X11 looks wrong, though. I think it should have been "1343", i.e. same pattern, reverse colors.
My comments above were based on viewing saved plot with ghostview and actually printing it with ghostscript. Bill -.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.- r-devel mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe" (in the "body", not the subject !) To: r-devel-request@stat.math.ethz.ch _._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._
Bill Simpson <wsimpson@uwinnipeg.ca> writes:
lty=1 solid lty=2 dashed lty=3 dotted lty=4 dotdashed lty="1" pattern: 1 "dot" on, 1 "dot" off lty="2" pattern: 2 "dots" on, 2 "dots" off lty="3" pattern: 3 "dots" on, 3 "dots" off lty="32" pattern: 3 "dots" on, 2 "dots" off lty="124" pattern: 1 on, 2 off, 4 on, 1 off, 2 on, 4 off, ...and so forth...
Peter, to me (and this is English language) "dot" is shorter than "dash"! .-.-- dot dash dot dash dash.
Sure
So "dot" SHOULD be label for lty="2" pattern: 2 "dots" on, 2 "dots" off And "dash" SHOULD be label for lty="3" pattern: 3 "dots" on, 3 "dots" off. Since dot is shorter than dash.
Look again: 2 is a number, selecting one of 4 preset patterns, "2" is a character, specifying the pattern directly. Try plot(1:10,type='l',lty=2,lwd=4) plot(1:10,type='l',lty=3,lwd=4) plot(1:10,type='l',lty='2',lwd=4) plot(1:10,type='l',lty='3',lwd=4)
This is answer to previous posting on lwd. So it is there, just not documented. Thanks.
In the snapshots, it is there... Don't know if it works on postscript yet, though.
O__ ---- Peter Dalgaard Blegdamsvej 3 c/ /'_ --- Dept. of Biostatistics 2200 Cph. N (*) \(*) -- University of Copenhagen Denmark Ph: (+45) 35327918 ~~~~~~~~~~ - (p.dalgaard@biostat.ku.dk) FAX: (+45) 35327907 -.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.- r-devel mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe" (in the "body", not the subject !) To: r-devel-request@stat.math.ethz.ch _._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._
OK now I get it. Sorry for cluttering the list with nonsense. BTW lwd works in R Graphics window but not when printed. (in my version of snapshot) Bill -.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.- r-devel mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe" (in the "body", not the subject !) To: r-devel-request@stat.math.ethz.ch _._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._