Skip to content

Orphaned ncvar? (PR#9603)

3 messages · chatfield at clio.arc.nasa.gov, Peter Dalgaard, Robert Chatfield

#
An orphaned package?  anyone in Switzerland know if there's an  
alternative?
Note the email.
I guess CRAN-R should be notified.

regards, Bob C

  
  
#
chatfield at clio.arc.nasa.gov wrote:
This appears confused. Where is the bug in R?

I have difficulties seeing even what it is you're trying to achieve, but 
for one thing, manipulating .libPaths is NOT the way to help anything 
find include files and C libraries (LD_LIBRARY_PATH and configure 
options might be). If the issue is that mail to juerg.schmidli bounces, 
how about looking him up on the net?

    -pd
1 day later
#
From one view, there is no confusion at all, Peter.

There are persistant difficulties with the binary builds at all sites  
I can try.  It seems that
this build is failing tests.  Possibly it's as simple as a change in  
name for the binary, but
it's impossible for me to guess the correct name.

Of course I tried source builds, but they also present real  
problems.   Techniques for
making libraries known ... and which libraries,    ... .h , ...lib,   
more specific dynamic iibraries ...
way beyond the poor soul who's paid to do statistics and science ...   
well, he is paid if he's lucky
and the funding is not suddenly pulled due to "shortfalls"   ... but  
it is.     ... We all try.

There is some help in what you mentioned ...
So what is the correct way and what are the techniques an humble  
atmospheric scientist
might figure this out based on the documentation that the scientist  
can _readily_ find.  I do try.

For example "Having difficulty with binary builds?    See ... and ...  
and ... ; note that ... documentation
is completely out of date and you had best write  
to ... at ... . ... . .. to find out what we all know,
and .... somehow ... you seem not to know.

(flame off)
best regards, Bob Chatfield
... big fan of R
On Apr 7, 2007, at 12:41 PM, Peter Dalgaard wrote: