Full_Name: g. schiessler
Version: 1.8.1
OS: Windows 2000 Pro
Submission from: (NULL) (24.229.106.55)
Appears to be memory leak with
=RApply("qnorm",K56)*-1 function
from within Excel 2000.
Have spreadsheet with between
100 and 500 of above references.
When spreadsheet first opened
system using about 200MB but
very quickly grows to over 600MB
and appears to be unlimited.
Is there another way to run qnorm
from within Excel with less memory?
memory leak (PR#5476)
2 messages · schiessler@agere.com, Brian Ripley
That appears to have been garbled en route. Could you please take a look at the FAQ and submit a reproducible example along the lines suggested there. On the face of it this appears to be a bug report on Excel 2000, but you may be using an R addin without mentioning it.
On Wed, 3 Dec 2003 schiessler@agere.com wrote:
Full_Name: g. schiessler
Version: 1.8.1
OS: Windows 2000 Pro
Submission from: (NULL) (24.229.106.55)
Appears to be memory leak with
=RApply("qnorm",K56)*-1 function
Is that line really correct? If so, what does it have to do with R?
from within Excel 2000. Have spreadsheet with between 100 and 500 of above references. When spreadsheet first opened system using about 200MB but very quickly grows to over 600MB and appears to be unlimited. Is there another way to run qnorm from within Excel with less memory?
______________________________________________ R-devel@stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list https://www.stat.math.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
Brian D. Ripley, ripley@stats.ox.ac.uk Professor of Applied Statistics, http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/~ripley/ University of Oxford, Tel: +44 1865 272861 (self) 1 South Parks Road, +44 1865 272866 (PA) Oxford OX1 3TG, UK Fax: +44 1865 272595