Dear R-devel, I recall that there used to be a mechanism to get around the requirement that all objects in a package have associated documentation; i.e., a way to specify a list of objects (mostly functions) that are not considered as part of the package API. Is this still available? I cannot find any mention in R-exts. I realize that the way to go is to have a name space, and eventually that's what I will do, but for now I rather spend the time doing other necessary clean-ups first. Any pointer much appreciated! Best, Andy Andy Liaw, PhD Biometrics Research PO Box 2000, RY33-300 Merck Research Labs Rahway, NJ 07065 mailto:andy_liaw at merck.com 732-594-0820
undocumented objects in a package
2 messages · Liaw, Andy, Uwe Ligges
Liaw, Andy wrote:
Dear R-devel, I recall that there used to be a mechanism to get around the requirement that all objects in a package have associated documentation; i.e., a way to specify a list of objects (mostly functions) that are not considered as part of the package API. Is this still available? I cannot find any mention in R-exts. I realize that the way to go is to have a name space, and eventually that's what I will do, but for now I rather spend the time doing other necessary clean-ups first. Any pointer much appreciated!
E.g. just make one simple help page with keyword "internal" with aliases for all the functions. You do not need to write exact documentation in this case. Uwe Ligges
Best, Andy Andy Liaw, PhD Biometrics Research PO Box 2000, RY33-300 Merck Research Labs Rahway, NJ 07065 mailto:andy_liaw at merck.com 732-594-0820
______________________________________________ R-devel at r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel