Hmmm. I think all the code in R should use the FINITE macro rather than the finite function. On non IEEE platforms FINITE can be defined to check for a special NA pattern. It would be possible to rename the macro to something more obscure if that would help. E.g. R_FINITE. Medium-term this whole area needs some work. It may be that we will have to have an R_specific implementation of functions like "finite" and "isnan". This is because there are just too many platforms which seem to screw them up. The prize (as usual) goes to Windows, where (0.0 == NaN) is true. Ross -.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.- r-devel mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe" (in the "body", not the subject !) To: r-devel-request@stat.math.ethz.ch _._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._
IBM AIX problems
1 message · Ross Ihaka