You are talking of <CRAN>/doc/Rnotes.ps, or Rnotes.tgz respectively,
yes?
The first page states both R & R as authors (beside Venables &
D.Smith). However, I doubt if they consider themselves as
'maintainers' of these notes (due to lack of time), or do you?
The problem is that these notes need more work than just ('nls' <->
'nlm').
Maybe I should ask again for volunteers, or maybe even a discussion
on what could / should be done.
The notes have several sections (organized in different *.tex files)
in Rnotes.tgz. Could(/should) we have different authors
(ie. volunteers from among you) for these sections?
About a year ago or so, Kurt Hornik proposed that these notes should
become chapter 1 -- n of ``the book'' where the current things in
RHOME/doc/manual/Man.tex are just the appendices (they already *are*
appendices, currently). R & R instead, originally thought (and have
also started ??) of completely rewriting from scratch these chapters
(1 -- n).
Which should be done (and by whom) ?
In the case of "R notes upgrading, it'd make sense if someone first
works thru the current notes and makes them (somewhat) ``compatible''
with the Rd.sty that we currently use for the help-manual (i.e. the
doc/manual/... things).