Skip to content

read.table, read.fwf, and na.strings (PR#7075)

1 message · Uwe Ligges

#
rmh@temple.edu wrote:

            
A blank field in the first column of the first row is:

   3456-999 01234
56-9990123412345

The field "-999 " cannot assumed to be blank in any sence from my point
of view.

Anyway, improving NA handling in read.fwf() is certainly something for
the wishlist (particularly padding blanks for na.string(s)). Is anybody
out there going to contribute (given anybody else thinks it is useful)?

Uwe Ligges