5 messages · Peter Dalgaard, Iñaki Ucar, Duncan Murdoch +1 more
Full schedule is available on https://developer.r-project.org (or https://svn.r-project.org/R-dev-web/trunk/index.html for the impatient).
Peter Dalgaard, Professor, Center for Statistics, Copenhagen Business School Solbjerg Plads 3, 2000 Frederiksberg, Denmark Phone: (+45)38153501 Office: A 4.23 Email: pd.mes at cbs.dk Priv: PDalgd at gmail.com ______________________________________________ R-devel at r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
Minor question: wouldn't the new pipe syntax be worth a minor version bump? A package planning to drop magrittr would end up depending on R 4.0.4, which sounds suboptimal. And (I don't find any reference to this in the manual or in CRAN policies, but) if I remember correctly, depending on a patch version was discouraged. I?aki On Thu, 21 Jan 2021 at 11:59, Peter Dalgaard via R-devel
Full schedule is available on https://developer.r-project.org (or https://svn.r-project.org/R-dev-web/trunk/index.html for the impatient). -- Peter Dalgaard, Professor, Center for Statistics, Copenhagen Business School Solbjerg Plads 3, 2000 Frederiksberg, Denmark Phone: (+45)38153501 Office: A 4.23 Email: pd.mes at cbs.dk Priv: PDalgd at gmail.com
______________________________________________ R-devel at r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel ______________________________________________ R-devel at r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
I?aki ?car
Minor question: wouldn't the new pipe syntax be worth a minor version bump?
I don't think I've seen anything to signal that it will end up in 4.0.4. It's intended for 4.1.0, as far as all the signs show. Duncan Murdoch A package planning to drop magrittr would end up depending on R
4.0.4, which sounds suboptimal. And (I don't find any reference to this in the manual or in CRAN policies, but) if I remember correctly, depending on a patch version was discouraged. I?aki On Thu, 21 Jan 2021 at 11:59, Peter Dalgaard via R-devel <r-devel at r-project.org> wrote:
Full schedule is available on https://developer.r-project.org (or https://svn.r-project.org/R-dev-web/trunk/index.html for the impatient). -- Peter Dalgaard, Professor, Center for Statistics, Copenhagen Business School Solbjerg Plads 3, 2000 Frederiksberg, Denmark Phone: (+45)38153501 Office: A 4.23 Email: pd.mes at cbs.dk Priv: PDalgd at gmail.com
______________________________________________ R-devel at r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel ______________________________________________ R-devel at r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
Am 21.01.21 um 13:51 schrieb I?aki Ucar:
Minor question: wouldn't the new pipe syntax be worth a minor version bump?
Yes. The NEWS mention the pipe syntax for R-devel not for R-patched. See the section "CHANGES IN R 4.0.3 patched" in https://stat.ethz.ch/R-manual/R-devel/doc/html/NEWS.html for what is currently included for R 4.0.4. Cheers, Sebastian
A package planning to drop magrittr would end up depending on R 4.0.4, which sounds suboptimal. And (I don't find any reference to this in the manual or in CRAN policies, but) if I remember correctly, depending on a patch version was discouraged. I?aki On Thu, 21 Jan 2021 at 11:59, Peter Dalgaard via R-devel <r-devel at r-project.org> wrote:
Full schedule is available on https://developer.r-project.org (or https://svn.r-project.org/R-dev-web/trunk/index.html for the impatient). -- Peter Dalgaard, Professor, Center for Statistics, Copenhagen Business School Solbjerg Plads 3, 2000 Frederiksberg, Denmark Phone: (+45)38153501 Office: A 4.23 Email: pd.mes at cbs.dk Priv: PDalgd at gmail.com
______________________________________________ R-devel at r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel ______________________________________________ R-devel at r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
Am 21.01.21 um 13:51 schrieb I?aki Ucar:
Minor question: wouldn't the new pipe syntax be worth a minor version bump?
Yes. The NEWS mention the pipe syntax for R-devel not for R-patched. See the section "CHANGES IN R 4.0.3 patched" in https://stat.ethz.ch/R-manual/R-devel/doc/html/NEWS.html for what is currently included for R 4.0.4.
Understood, thanks!
I?aki ?car