An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: not available Url: https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-devel/attachments/20070827/6e038322/attachment.pl
[OT] How many useRs?
4 messages · Charles C. Berry, Andy Bunn, Dirk Eddelbuettel
Ahem!
RSiteSearch("user base")
On Mon, 27 Aug 2007, Andy Bunn wrote:
I figured the devel list would have people on it who might know the answer to this.... Is there a reliable (for some definition of reliable) estimate of how many people use R or have downloaded it? Say an order of magnitude estimate? I would like to mention this in the introduction to a paper I'm writing where I encourage R's use. Thanks for any help. -Andy [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
______________________________________________ R-devel at r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
Charles C. Berry (858) 534-2098
Dept of Family/Preventive Medicine
E mailto:cberry at tajo.ucsd.edu UC San Diego
http://famprevmed.ucsd.edu/faculty/cberry/ La Jolla, San Diego 92093-0901
I've seen that thread. Given the way R use has increased over the last
three and a half years I thought it not unlikely that somebody might
have taken a stab at this again.
-----Original Message-----
From: Charles C. Berry [mailto:cberry at tajo.ucsd.edu]
Sent: Monday, August 27, 2007 3:44 PM
To: Andy Bunn
Cc: r-devel at r-project.org
Subject: Re: [Rd] [OT] How many useRs?
Ahem!
RSiteSearch("user base")
On Mon, 27 Aug 2007, Andy Bunn wrote:
I figured the devel list would have people on it who might know the answer to this.... Is there a reliable (for some definition of reliable) estimate of how many people use R or have downloaded it? Say an order of magnitude estimate? I would like to mention this in the introduction to a paper I'm writing where I encourage R's use. Thanks for any help. -Andy [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
______________________________________________ R-devel at r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
Charles C. Berry (858) 534-2098
Dept of Family/Preventive
Medicine
E mailto:cberry at tajo.ucsd.edu UC San Diego
http://famprevmed.ucsd.edu/faculty/cberry/ La Jolla, San Diego
92093-0901
On 27 August 2007 at 13:19, Andy Bunn wrote:
| Is there a reliable (for some definition of reliable) estimate of how | many people use R or have downloaded it? Say an order of magnitude | estimate? I would like to mention this in the introduction to a paper | I'm writing where I encourage R's use. With a salt mine rather than a mere grain of salt, you could consider the 'popularity contest' results from Debian and Ubuntu. Briefly, it's an 'opt-in' service that submits the list of installed packages, anonymoysly, to an aggregation address. Using Ubuntu's large install base, we get from http://popcon.ubuntu.com that eg the GNU bc package in their 'main/math' section is installed (and reported) 174452 times (based on http://popcon.ubuntu.com/main/math/by_inst). As this is a mandatory package, we can use this as the baseline. On the other hand r-base-core (from the optional universe/math section) is installed 2638 times (see http://popcon.ubuntu.com/universe/math/by_inst). So you get 2638 / 174452 or around 1.5%. You now need to figure the various self-selection biases and correct for those... As a check, for Debian (with popcon.debian.org as the base URL), we get 1686 / 54221 or around 3.1% (using file http://popcon.debian.org/main/math/by_inst). So even this crude measure has a large amount of variability. So I still invoke fortune(43). But if you insist, you could use Microsoft's recent 'one billion PCs' estimate (news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/2077986.stm), apply the percentages we laboriously derive above and call it 15 to 31 million.... Dirk
Three out of two people have difficulties with fractions.