Peter Kleiweg <p.c.j.kleiweg at rug.nl> writes:
Peter Dalgaard schreef op de 31e dag van de wijnmaand van het jaar 2006:
Peter Kleiweg <p.c.j.kleiweg at rug.nl> writes:
Peter Dalgaard schreef op de 31e dag van de wijnmaand van het jaar 2006:
p.c.j.kleiweg at rug.nl writes:
'make check' fails on d-p-q-r-tests:
--please do not edit the information below--
Version:
platform = i686-pc-linux-gnu
arch = i686
os = linux-gnu
system = i686, linux-gnu
status =
major = 2
minor = 4.0
year = 2006
month = 10
day = 03
svn rev = 39566
language = R
version.string = R version 2.4.0 (2006-10-03)
Locale:
LC_CTYPE=nl_NL at euro;LC_NUMERIC=C;LC_TIME=nl_NL at euro;LC_COLLATE=C;LC_MONETARY=nl_NL at euro;LC_MESSAGES=nl_NL at euro;LC_PAPER=nl_NL at euro;LC_NAME=C;LC_ADDRESS=C;LC_TELEPHONE=C;LC_MEASUREMENT=nl_NL at euro;LC_IDENTIFICATION=C
You need to be more specific (yes, it is unfortunate that we cannot
extract all details about Linuxen from the Version: listing). Which
distribution, did you compile youself or use a binary, and if the
former: did you set any special compiler flags?
11000 lines or so deleted, and you still didn't answer the questions....
(well, I can tell that it is SUSE, and it must be an old version since
you are using the ancient 2.95.3 compilers...)
SuSE. It's right there in config.log.
And there is nothing ancient about 2.95.3 compilers.
did you compile youself or use a binary
I sent you config.log. That should give you a clue.
did you set any special compiler flags?
Did you read the first few lines of config.log?
Any questions I missed?
Why should we care? It's your problem and your job to make it easier
for maintainers to track down problems. Copying config.log to a public
mailing list could be considered thoughtless, the above is plainly
insulting.