Skip to content
Prev 11572 / 398502 Next

2D convolution

On Mon, 4 Jun 2001, Kjetil Kjernsmo wrote:

            
How about don't?  That is, do it at C/Fortran level.  2D convolution tends
to be expensive and edge effects can be much trickier.  When we had to do
it in earnest (2D optical astronomy from CCD arrays, pre-R) fortunately
the objects of interest were in the centre of the image, so edge effects
were small, and we wrote Fortran routines to do it in place (also based on
Singleton's code).

Note that mvfft does not do 2D transforms: it's fft that does so (as I
read the docs).