TeX distribution on Windows
On 9/5/05, G??ran Brostr??m <gb at stat.umu.se> wrote:
On Mon, Sep 05, 2005 at 01:55:39PM -0400, Peter Flom wrote:
Goran wrote <<< The consensus (so far) seems to be to stick to MikTeX and skip proTeXt. Thanks for all the input.
Well, nothing against MikTeX, but ProteXt also works fine with R.
I have made some studying; it seems as if proTeXt is nothing but MikTeX together with WinEdt or TeXnicsCenter and ghostscript/ghostview, so the choice is really between WinEdt and (X)Emacs; you get MikTeX in both cases.
In that case it probably uses the same registry entries in which case the batch utilities I mentioned would likely work with it without any change.