Subject: Re: [R] plm random effect: the estimated variance of the individual effect is negative
Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2013 16:26:01 +0100
From: Giovanni_Millo at Generali.com
To: ognibenematteo at hotmail.it
CC: r-help at r-project.org
Matteo,
I fully agree with David: please read the posting guide.
Anyway, the error message says it all: "the estimated variance of the
individual effect is negative". See e.g. the "basic panel" chapter (10
or 11) in Wooldridge's "Econometric Analysis of XS and Panel Data" to
understand why this may happen.
Stata's behaviour is (as far as I remember) to transparently substitute
it with 0; 'plm's is to let the estimation fail, issuing a warning. You
can try a different 'random.method' which may, or might not, solve the
problem, depending on your data.
Hint: a random effects model with sigma_mu=0 is a pooling model.
HTH
Giovanni Millo, PhD
Research Dept.,
Assicurazioni Generali SpA
Via Machiavelli 3,
34132 Trieste (Italy)
tel. +39 040 671184
fax +39 040 671160
------------ original message ------------------
Message: 49
Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2013 13:23:07 -0800
From: David Winsemius <dwinsemius at comcast.net>
To: matteo ognibene <ognibenematteo at hotmail.it>
Cc: "r-help at r-project.org" <r-help at r-project.org>
Subject: Re: [R] plm random effect: the estimated variance of the
individual effect is negative
Message-ID: <D32FDC11-38AE-4AAF-9270-30C791232A24 at comcast.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes
On Jan 3, 2013, at 8:19 AM, matteo ognibene wrote:
I have a problem with the variance estimation in a random effect model
I used this formula to get my result, and it works:reg <- deltaF ~
L1.deltaF + L2.deltaF + deltaCDS + L1.deltaCDS + L2.deltaCDS +
L3.deltaCDS + deltaUS_Yields + deltaZ + L1.deltaZ + L2.deltaZfixed
<- plm(reg, data=Mody_R, na.action = na.exclude,
index=c("country_id", "datestata"), model="random")
but when i split my dataframe into several groups it gives me this
error:"Error in swar(object, data, effect) : the estimated
variance of the individual effect is negative"
The code i used to split the dataframe is:SplitMody <- split(Mody_R,
Mody_R$period)SplitFixed <- lapply(SplitMody, function(Mody_R)
plm(reg, data=Mody_R, na.action = na.exclude, index=c("country_id",
"datestata"), model="random"))
I want to point the all the code works perfectly in a within model,
and I tried using all the random.method for the variance
estimation.In addition I used the same model in Stata and it
works... (the results are identical for a within model in R and Stata)
I'll be really gratefull if someone can help me.
Thanks,Matteo
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
Head up; matteo: This is pretty much unreadable (due to the failure to
follow the recommended posting procedure.)
--
David Winsemius, MD
Alameda, CA, USA
--------------- end original message ---------------
Ai sensi del D.Lgs. 196/2003 si precisa che le informazioni contenute in questo messaggio sono riservate ed a uso esclusivo del destinatario. Qualora il messaggio in parola Le fosse pervenuto per errore, La invitiamo ad eliminarlo senza copiarlo e a non inoltrarlo a terzi, dandocene gentilmente comunicazione. Grazie.
Pursuant to Legislative Decree No. 196/2003, you are hereby informed that this message contains confidential information intended only for the use of the addressee. If you are not the addressee, and have received this message by mistake, please delete it and immediately notify us. You may not copy or disseminate this message to anyone. Thank you.