More powerful than objects() or ls()
On Thu, 22 Mar 2001, Patrick Connolly wrote:
There are times when the date is very valuable information, particularly years later. I would like to be able to do something similar in R but of course, the same method won't work because objects are not stored as separate unix files in a .Data directory. I had thought of adding a date with attr() and was then going to redo the function which could use that information in place of the file information I used in Splus. Unfortunately, that means the date attibute is added to everything when displayed which is too cluttered. Then of course, I'd need to figure an easy (preferably automatic) way of adding the date to the objects I was interested in. However, I was hoping someone might already have a better way of achieving the same end, and preferably without the unnecessary verbiage mentioned above.
comment() does the information management you need. There isn't an automatic way of doing the date information and I can't think ofa general one that wouldn't be horribly slow. You could add a date-setting function to your most frequnelty used object creation functions (perhaps read.table and glm in my case). -thomas -.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.- r-help mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe" (in the "body", not the subject !) To: r-help-request at stat.math.ethz.ch _._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._