Lexical scoping is not what I expect
On Jun 30, 2013, at 14:35 , Duncan Murdoch wrote:
On 13-06-29 11:58 PM, Greg Snow wrote:
If you want to write really confusing code it is possible to do: `1` <- 2 `1` + 1 and things like that, but it is probably a good idea not to.
This is actually pretty simple, as the White Knight could tell you. `1` is what the name of 2 is called. The name really is "2". It's called "two", but that's only what it's called. It really is two. Duncan Murdoch
Don't you mean "1" and "one"? As in
as.name("1")
`1` -pd
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 7:30 PM, Rolf Turner <rolf.turner at xtra.co.nz> wrote:
On 29/06/13 02:54, John Fox wrote:
Dear Duncan and Steve, Since Steve's example raises it, I've never understood why it's legal to change the built-in global "constants" in R, including T and F. That just seems to me to set a trap for users. Why not treat these as reserved symbols, like TRUE, Inf, etc.?
I rather enjoy being able to set
pi <- 3
:-)
cheers,
Rolf Turner
______________________________**________________ R-help at r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/**listinfo/r-help<https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help> PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/** posting-guide.html <http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html> and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
______________________________________________ R-help at r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
Peter Dalgaard, Professor, Center for Statistics, Copenhagen Business School Solbjerg Plads 3, 2000 Frederiksberg, Denmark Phone: (+45)38153501 Email: pd.mes at cbs.dk Priv: PDalgd at gmail.com