WinBUGS posterior samples (via R2WinBUGS)?
3 comments: 1. Quoting the last lines of this message: "PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code." Otherwise we cannot help anyway. 2. This is not the BUGS mailing list. 3. I do prefer BRugs, the R package that is based on OpenBUGS, because it is closer to BUGS, more flexible, sometimes easier to debug, .... Best wishes, Uwe Ligges
Anny Huang wrote:
Hi all, I did some analysis using package R2WinBUGS to call WinBUGS. I set the iterations to 50000 (fairly a large number, I think), but after the program was done, the effective posterior samples contained only 7 draws. I don't know why. By the way, I checked posterior sample size by using bugsobj$n.sims. And, for my previous practice with WinBUGS/R2WinBUGS, no such strange thing happend. Does anybody have some idea on what might be wrong with my model or whatever part in this program? Appreciate it. Anny [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
______________________________________________ R-help at r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.