mcl models, percentages
On Wed, 14 May 2003, John Hendrickx wrote:
A caveat is that "clogit" in R doesn't produce the same estimates as "multilog", although the likelihood functions for both models are the same. The maximum absolute difference is 0.0034, the mean absolute difference is 0.00069. Stata's "clogit" and "mlogit" produce the same estimates and match those of "multilog" to at least 6 decimal points accuracy. See the notes in http://www.xs4all.nl/~jhckx/R/mcl.html Can anyone shed any light on this?
Two possibilities 1/ not having converged far enough: the convergence tolerance for coxph is by default only 1e-4 (yes, I should change it) 2/ Weights. In one of your examples you have frequency weights passed to clogit. This doesn't work (at least, it isn't equivalent to passing in the expanded data) because weighting doesn't make coxph compute the full set of permutations that you need for the likelihood in a large stratum. -thomas