Skip to content
Prev 8288 / 398506 Next

changes in glm?

On Thu, 30 Nov 2000, G.Janacek wrote:

            
I shouldn't think anyone can remember -- that's a long time ago.
Shouldn't be.  I have used in on both 32-bit and 64-bit Solaris.
Yes, definitely update. Many many bugs were fixed before 1.0.0.  You won't
get any support for pre1.0 versions.  The newest version is 1.1.1, and
while a shiny new 1.2 is due out in a couple of weeks we expect quite a
lot of people to stick with 1.1.1 for the rest of the Northern hemisphere
academic year.
It's hard to tell without knowing exactly what you did to get the error.
The error means that glm() thinks you gave it a matrix rather than a
vector as the response (outcome, dependent) variable.

Remember, the purpose of a bug report is for us to reproduce the bug. This
isn't being difficult -- we usually can't fix bugs unless we can reproduce
them.

Bug reports get fixed a lot faster if they are of the form

	"I did X. Y happened. I think Z should have happened"


   -thomas

Thomas Lumley
Assistant Professor, Biostatistics
University of Washington, Seattle



-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-
r-help mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html
Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe"
(in the "body", not the subject !)  To: r-help-request at stat.math.ethz.ch
_._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._