Skip to content
Prev 181313 / 398503 Next

sciplot question

Dear Frank, et al.:
Frank E Harrell Jr wrote:
To what do you attribute the nonnormality you see in most cases?  


           (1) Unmodeled components of variance that can generate errors 
in interpretation if ignored, even with bootstrapping? 


           (2) Honest outliers that do not relate to the phenomena of 
interest and would better be removed through improved checks on data 
quality, but where bootstrapping is appropriate (provided the data are 
not also contaminated with (1))? 


           (3) Situations where the physical application dictates a 
different distribution such as binomial, lognormal, gamma, etc., 
possibly also contaminated with (1) and (2)? 


      I've fit mixtures of normals to data before, but one needs to be 
careful about not carrying that to extremes, as the mixture may be a 
result of (1) and therefore not replicable. 


      George Box once remarked that he thought most designed experiments 
included split plotting that had been ignored in the analysis.  That is 
only a special case of (1). 


      Thanks,
      Spencer Graves