David Winsemius
On Mar 1, 2009, at 11:47 AM, Kevski wrote:
>
> I'm completely stumped and seem to be going around for 2 days in the
> wrong
> circles. Here's what I have in 2 dataframes:
>
>> dim(params.data); head(params.data, n=2)
> [1] 284 6
> item a1 a2 b1 b2 c
> 1 1 0.6671587 0.9588642 -3.5 -3.437961 0.2
> 2 2 1.1296298 1.4899307 -3.5 -4.146118 0.2
>
>> dim(examinees.data); head(examinees.data, n=2)
> [1] 1600 3
> examinee theta1 theta2
> 1 1 -3 -3.133437
> 2 2 -3 -3.293341
>
> I also have a function, p(), that takes on values for a1, a2, b1,
> b2, c,
> theta1, and theta2, then outputs a value.
>
> I would like to produce a 3-column array that is 284*1600 = 454400
> rows long
> for my simulator. Somthing like:
> examinee item p
> 1 1 1 p-value
> 2 1 2 p-value
> ...
> 454399 1600 283 p-value
> 454400 1600 284 p-value
>
> My brain seems to be stuck in a for-loop loop. I'm sure there is an
> elegant
> and efficient R way to do this, but I can't seem to find the right
> brain
> prompts in help pages, forum searches, or my trusty R Book. So, I
> appreciate
> any guidance you might be able to provide.
>
> Cheers,
> Kev-
> --
> View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Combining-2-arrays-into-a-third-array-via-a-function-tp22274922p22274922.html
> Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
> ______________________________________________
> R-help at r-project.org mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
> PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
> and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.