Analysis
Don't know if the data will support the result that you want but the only way to get some sort of answer is to hire a statistician. ranjan On Wed, 13 Nov 2013 20:58:30 -0400 Jim Silverton
<jim.silverton at gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,
I have 187 urine cultures which were subjected to culture and microscopy
methods. Video were used to 'verify' the findings. Culture is considered
the gold method. But Microscopy is another method which may be cheaper. I
checked the videos to determine whether bacteria was growing on both the
culture and microscopy readings to ' verify' what was really happening.
My question is this...How can I show that Microscopy is superior?
Is there a special test available?
*Microscopy* *Positive* *Negative* *Culture Positive* *Video
Positive* *47* *5* *52* Video Negative 0 *2* *2* *Culture Negative* Video
Positive 18 *0* *18* *Video Negative* *5* *110* *115* *70* *117*
*187*
--
Thanks,
Jim.
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
______________________________________________ R-help at r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
Important Notice: This mailbox is ignored: e-mails are set to be deleted on receipt. Please respond to the mailing list if appropriate. For those needing to send personal or professional e-mail, please use appropriate addresses. ____________________________________________________________ GET FREE SMILEYS FOR YOUR IM & EMAIL - Learn more at http://www.inbox.com/smileys Works with AIM?, MSN? Messenger, Yahoo!? Messenger, ICQ?, Google Talk? and most webmails